Genetical Engineering is Wrong Essay - 951 Words

At one time, golden rice was just a wild idea that Ingo Potrykus thought up. Optimally, golden rice would improve the lives of millions of the poorest people in the world. The rice would contain beta-carotene which is the building block for vitamin A. However, imagining golden rice was one thing and bringing it into existence was another. He struggled for years with his colleagues to deal with the finicky growing habits of the rice they transplanted to a greenhouse near the foot hills of the Swiss Alps. Potrykus and his colleagues became successful in the spring of 1999. By creating golden rice, Potrykus wanted to be sure it would reach malnourished children of the developing world; those for whom it was intended. He knew that would†¦show more content†¦There are a few concerns with product such as golden rice. All foods created through genetic engineering, are potential sources of allergens. The genes that are transferred contain instructions for making proteins, in which a ll proteins are not created equal- some proteins cause allergic reactions. Genetic pollution is another major concern. Pollen grains from wind-pollinated plants as corn and canola, for example, are carried far and wide. Transgenic canola, for instance, grown in one field can very easily pollinate nontransgenic plans grown in the next, obviously causing problems. Ecological concerns also exist. Entomoligist John Losey performed an experiment by dusting Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) corn pollen on plants populated by the monarch butterfly caterpillars. Many of the caterpillars died. Bt has different strains of which produce toxins that target specific insects. Bt is claimed to be a safe and effective natural insecticide that is popular with organic farmers. Like anything, genetically engineered rice will have its pros and cons. Bina Robinson stated the Food and Drug Administration seems to have left safety considerations up to biotech companies, who see nothing wrong with snipping genes out of one species and inserting them into a completely unrelated one, thus blurring distinctions between plants and animals. This constitutes a nightmare for people with food allergies or religious or ethical concerns about eating animals. We need toShow MoreRelatedStrategies For Preventing Misuse : The Girl Who Played With Fire1098 Words   |  5 Pagesand how it is using technology to spy on its citizens. Tenzin Gyatso share his opinion about technology in â€Å"Ethics and the New Genetics†, and he explains how the vast majority of people do not have the right knowledge to tamper with genetics and genetical science; thus, leading to the misuse of technology. All these texts share a common subject which is that they talk about how if technology is not used correctly it may lead to negative outcomes. While the Kiki Kannibal text is based from personalRead MoreAnalysis of the Impact of Science on Society1263 Words   |  5 Pagesdevelopment of biological weaponry has enhan ced social security as well as reduced it. This is because the development has been focused on two ends; to defend the people making it and help counter enemies. The worst case happens when the weapons land in the wrong hands, especially when they land on terrorists’ hands. A lesson Americans learned since the attack was that anything was possible. Though biological weapons were mostly used in during colonial and world wars periods, it is highly suspected that stillRead MoreMedical Ethics And Ethical Ethics1931 Words   |  8 Pagesand evolving state of medical ethics and recent developments in pharmaceutical and genetic methods of treatment. Many novel treatments may cast into doubt what is considered ethical and unethical – new developments in stem cell therapy, genetic engineering, transplant surgery, and pharmaceutical testing all have their own moral â€Å"grey areas† in terms of what is considered unethical. Is the line blurred between ethical and unethic al practice, and therefore practice and malpractice, when to do harm untoRead MoreAmerican Eugenics Movement Essay1921 Words   |  8 Pagesdiseases. Yes, it is a farfetched idea but with rapidly growing technology and knowledge it is becoming a great probability. Possible worries and fears for future eugenics is the abuse of knowledge. In the future if this information falls into the wrong hands such as insurance companies that you are one of the few with a disease you can be denied coverage or if you are applying for a job but because of your ailment are rebuffed. Future eugenicists can extort their knowledge and use it to their advantageRead MoreShould Genetic Engineering Be Controlled by Law?2870 Words   |  12 PagesMy topic: Should Genetic Engineering Be Controlled by Law? Table of Contents 1. Abstract of this research paper. 2. What is genetic engineeringï ¼Å¸ 3. What kinds of ethical problems are there? 4. Freedom of scholarship. 5. Innovative remedy for obstinate diseases. 6. Solutions for ethical problems. 7. Conclusion including my prospects. 8. References Abstract of the research paper Read MoreThe Government As An Intermediate Agency2120 Words   |  9 Pagesby. The practice of eugenics, whether positive or negative, is still widely encountered all around the world, particularly in the genetic field dealing with cloning, gene therapy and selections, artificial inseminations, egg donations or genetic engineering. Nevertheless, even with the public rejection of eugenics from pioneers in the field such as Thomas Hunt Morgan, much of his genetic research was absorbed by it, and it is greatly seen as a step towards medical, scientifical and sociological evolutionRead MoreSources of Ethics20199 Words   |  81 PagesEnvironmental Ethics: 22 2.14- Ethics And Other Religion: 25 2.2- GENETIC INHERITANCE: 31 2.21- LINKAGE OF GENETICS AND ETHICS: 32 Introduction: 32 HumGen: 37 Nuffield Council on Bioethics: 39 The European Union’s: 43 2.22- GENETICAL BEHAVIOR: 44 2.23- ETHICS OF BEHAVIOR HAS A BIOLOGICAL BASIS? 47 Behavioural Ethics And Genetics Study: 48 Implications of Behavioural Genetics Research In Society: 50 How the genes influence behaviour and ethics: 52 2.3- PHILOSOPHICAL: